The Power of the Better Argument

This website is based partly on the discourse ethics of the respected German philosopher Jürgen Habermas. Consequently, we will seek to let the unforced force of the better argument prevail. It is probably possible to decide which arguments are better than others in a discussion about defensive political violence because such violence is only justified if it follows logically from the commonly acknowledged principles of self-defence and necessity. These principles are the standard by which one can judge if the arguments in favour of defensive political violence are better than those opposed to militant operations. We will immediately close down the website if it can be clearly proven that defensive political violence is not in accordance with these principles.

We don’t dogmatically support violent methods. We don’t support any political or ideological view. We only support the better argument whatever it may be.

We will follow common sense, ordinary logic, and scientifically documented facts. Defensive political violence is not based on any “special insights” that only the elect few can understand. Its premise is ordinary human beings’ understanding of justice, combined with well-founded arguments presented by respected legal professionals and other scientists. Everyone should in principle be able to follow the logic of the arguments and see for themselves that the conclusions follow reasonably from the premises. No magic, no esoteric knowledge, and you don’t have to be an Einstein to participate in the debate. If something is unclear, ask for clarification.

Our standard is the same as the rest of the scientific community. No ad hoc arguments, no avoidance of troublesome questions, and we will not try to change facts to make them fit any preconceived theory.

Violence is always horrible, even when it is justifiable, so nothing would be better if all kinds of political violence is refuted once and for all. Then we can all relax and spend our time doing things more constructive. We challenge supporters of non-violence to join our search for arguments against the use of physical force.